Es`haq Taheri Sarteshnizi دانشیار فلسفه مجتمع آموزش عالی شهید محلاتی author Mahdi Jalalvand کارشناس ارشد فلسفه و کلام اسلامی دانشگاه قم author text article 2013 per Religious knowledge is consists of doctrines that could be attain with amethodological cognition and inquiry concerning religious sources. But thePrerequisite of This kind of knowledge is some principles that from whichscholarly studies on religion is begin and leads to conclusion. AllamehTabatabaei, in his efforts to achieve a regular and accurate cognition ofReligion according to his Special principles, has focused on this point andintroduces some presuppositions that with exceeding from which one mayperceive religious teachings. He has also two presuppositions:epistemological and ontological. The possibility of analyzing and evaluatingof religious knowledge, is an epistemological presupposition; and belief inGod, religion, human ability and the world of existence, is considered asontological presupposition. So he believes that an accurate understanding ofreligion would be possible only if we try to transcend from thesepresuppositions and use our principles of religious knowledge. University of Tehran 2008-7063 10 v. 3 no. 2013 1 24 https://jpht.ut.ac.ir/article_36187_b87c97f43867e9767a364fc782237def.pdf dx.doi.org/10.22059/jpht.2013.36187 AliRedha MohammadRedhaei استادیار پردیس فارابی دانشگاه تهران author Fatemah Akbarizade student in university author text article 2013 per Holy Quran’s commentators according to their different ideologicalapproaches and scientific capabilities, have given different explanationsfrom Quranic verses. Because they are affected first of all, by the depth of itsContent and then by implications that are used in it. In this article we aregoing to analyze some of the Maryam verses, concerning custom andchastity (16-32) with a descriptive-analytical method. So we will analyze thelinguistic structure and various levels of the meanings, and the context ofthese verses; and with emphasizing their textual structure's cohesion, andwith patterning it out, and appealing to the verses themselves and theirdoctrines, we will make a new inquiry about Quranic concepts. This researchwill illuminate that the linguistic syntaxes of this verses along with structuraland thematic cohesion, are founded upon ideational and interpersonal metafunctions.In holy Quran The story of Maryam and her faith-oriented actionswere formed with her interacting with custom and emphasizing thesignificance of observing chastity. The chastity and interaction with customswere formed the linguistic structures of the doctrine of Maryam and itscohesion and speech acts. University of Tehran 2008-7063 10 v. 3 no. 2013 25 50 https://jpht.ut.ac.ir/article_36188_7e2e64de3a9235de430def79819e0a5d.pdf dx.doi.org/10.22059/jpht.2013.36188 Ali Fazli عضو هیئت علمی پژوهشگاه فرهنگ و اندیشۀ اسلامی author text article 2013 per The philosophy of theoretical Mysticism, as one of the branches ofphilosophy of mysticism, concern with different issues like: Epistemologicalfoundations of Theoretical Mystic; the quality and the manner of thisintuition for mystic; the manner of transferring this intuition to a propositionby mystic; and so on. This article is articulated according to two abovementioned purposes, i.e. the process of intuitional cognitions, and theprocess of transferring intuitional cognitions to propositions. At the firstaspect, beside explaining the domain of intuitional cognition, I will discussthree essential condition of intuition as follow: the principle of coordination,relevance, and influence. And at the second aspect, after taking the issue of'witness' into consideration, I will first of all, divide the experimentalconcept of things into "supposition" and "admission"; and then I willinterpret them according to mystical thought. At the end, I have dividedmystical admissions into descriptive, explanatory, interpretational, deductiveand comparative propositions. University of Tehran 2008-7063 10 v. 3 no. 2013 51 74 https://jpht.ut.ac.ir/article_36189_d13901fbc1044f95147363358fc2766a.pdf dx.doi.org/10.22059/jpht.2013.36189 Mansour Nasiri استادیار پردیس فارابی دانشگاه تهران author text article 2013 per In recent time deductive proof for the existence of God, i.e. Demonstrationthrough consciousness, is one of the most influential way that thinkers likeRobert Adams and Richard Swinburne have followed it. But the newestversion of this proof is belong to Moreland. This article is going to examineMoreland's view in four parts: Some preliminary points will presented in twofirst part. In third part we are going to introduce Moreland proof which isfollowed through consciousness and maintain that the best option forexplanation of the problem of consciousness is "theism". In next part theadversary options and alternative for theism are presented. And At the end,after taking Moreland's proof into consideration, finally we will criticize thisargument and explain its deficiency and defect. University of Tehran 2008-7063 10 v. 3 no. 2013 75 100 https://jpht.ut.ac.ir/article_36190_d56e52069d4f1d650fa61183c7b5a08f.pdf dx.doi.org/10.22059/jpht.2013.36190 Qodrat_allah Qorbani استادیار فلسفه دانشگاه خوارزمی author text article 2013 per Understanding The principle of Ending Prophethood (KHATAMIYYAT)with prophet Muhammad (p.b.u.h) depends on accurate investigation ofsome important issues including: explanation of the Quran as immanentmiracle; the meaning of intellectual maturity of people when Islam rises; themeaning and function of Vicar (IMAMAT), and finally the meaning ofcomprehensiveness and completeness of Islam. For this reason, incomparison with the miracles of the other prophets, the unique properties ofQuran as an immanent miracle of the Prophet of Islam, will be considered.Moreover we should pay attention to the importance of relative maturity ofMuslims at that time. that is to say, it is a biological and historical fact thatby this time early Islam's people had reached to some abilities to enablethem to grasp the verses of holy Quran and Hadith and preserve it fromdistortion. In addition, the principle of Vicar (IMAMAT) which wasrepeatedly enounced by the Prophet Muhammad himself, is an evidence andindication for ending of prophethood. Finally, all the Quranic verbal andpractical teachings of the Prophet Muhammad that called Tradition,(SUNNAT) and "HADITH", show that these teachings are universal,permanent and unchangeable, and could conduct both the temporal andspiritual needs of Human beings. Islam from the beginning has destined theguidance and leadership of its followers; first of all by a determined Imam,and then by religious scholars that called "FAGHIH". University of Tehran 2008-7063 10 v. 3 no. 2013 101 122 https://jpht.ut.ac.ir/article_36191_801bd398964318904241924110808872.pdf dx.doi.org/10.22059/jpht.2013.36191 Mohammad Redha Rajabi دکترای ادیان و عرفان تطبیقی دانشگاه قم author Parvin Kazemzadeh دانشجوی دکتری و پژوهشگر پژوهشکدۀ دانشگاه ادیان و مذاهب قم author text article 2013 per One of the oldest and controversial issues That first springs to philosophersand theologians mind was relationship between reason and religion, and oneof the consequences of This controversies were division of philosophers andtheologians to fideism or inclusive and moderate critical rationalist.According to martyr Motahhari, reason in itself does not contradict religion;and when reason conflicts with religious law, reason should be regarded asauthoritative. According to him, reason comprehends the spirit of Islam andacts accordingly; although, it may apparently conflict with some narrationsand traditions. He neither believes in fideism and nor could justify Clifford'sinclusive and strong rationalism. However, it seems to me that he agree withmoderate rationalism of Thomas Aquinas and the like; although his idea inthis respect to some extent is differ from them, especially in explaining ofthis problem. University of Tehran 2008-7063 10 v. 3 no. 2013 123 148 https://jpht.ut.ac.ir/article_36192_f93da3704a83595ff3f13c84210d71aa.pdf dx.doi.org/10.22059/jpht.2013.36192 Sayyed Hosein Noori مدرس پردیس فارابی دانشگاه تهران author text article 2013 per Among Islamic sects There are two groups that disagree about the issue ofBada`: Imamiyeh or Shiites, from one hand considers Bada` as one of theoriginal principles of Islamic beliefs and In order to prove this believe theyhave proposed four reasons, among which the most important is the deletionand notation verse (Mahv va Esbat) in Quran. On the other hand, Sunni'sscholars are strongly against the issue of Bada` and believe that one of itsimplications and consequences is acceptance of God's knowledge after hisignorance, while this is not admissible about God. The lexical meaning ofBada` is emersion after hiding; but Imamiyeh does not intend such ameaning. The meaning that they educe from the word Bada`, is “the changein people`s life path via their actions” and all scholars (Shiites and Sunnie)accept this fact. Therefore this conflict is indeed a lexical dispute, rather thana semantic. because, the fact which here is denieded, is not actually believedin, and what is believed in, has not been denied. University of Tehran 2008-7063 10 v. 3 no. 2013 149 178 https://jpht.ut.ac.ir/article_36193_267f31d05ca604a46b78202045b21909.pdf dx.doi.org/10.22059/jpht.2013.36193