%0 Journal Article %T A comparative study of the quiddity of the body of resurrection according to Ibn-Sina, Suhrawardi and MullaSadra’s view point %J Philosophy of Religion %I University of Tehran %Z 2008-7063 %A Maftooni, Nadia %A RezaininNia, RezaininNia %D 2012 %\ 07/22/2012 %V 9 %N 10 %P 93-110 %! A comparative study of the quiddity of the body of resurrection according to Ibn-Sina, Suhrawardi and MullaSadra’s view point %K bodily resurrection %K Elemental body %K Heavenly body %K Imaginary body %K Intermediary body %R 10.22059/jpht.2012.24900 %X Most of the theologians and Muslim philosophers, at least In accordance with tradition and narrative, believe in bodily resurrection as a necessary faith; but they have different conceptualizations of the “body of resurrection” such as: elemental body, heavenly body, intermediary body and imaginary body. The presentation of these conceptualizations will help us to find guidelines for more accurate judgments of bodily resurrection; especially in ascribing the issue of rational repudiation of bodily resurrection to Ibn-Sina, and understanding theologians view about homogenization of body of resurrection with worldly body. %U https://jpht.ut.ac.ir/article_24900_268528c00f2ad35b5f510c5123ec19c4.pdf