University of Tehran Press Philosophy of Religion 2008-7063 10 2 2013 08 23 An analysis Concerning Allameh Tabatabayi and 20th Century Theologians' Empirical Reasoning about Existence of God An analysis Concerning Allameh Tabatabayi and 20th Century Theologians' Empirical Reasoning about Existence of God 59 75 35496 10.22059/jpht.2013.35496 FA Aella Torani Monir Soltan Ahmadi Journal Article 2013 02 24 Beside intellectual and intuitional proofs for the existence of God, there are "empirical proof" that are clearer and more conceivable for ordinary peoples. the present article is going to analyses Allameh Tabatabayi and the twenty century western scholar's empirical proofs for the existence of God.<br />So moreover evaluating the values of both ones, we will explain their differences and similarities. "Design argument", "coming into existence" (hoduth) and the argument which is depend on "evolution theory", are considered as both Allameh and western thinkers' similarities; although both of them have special reasoning in this field. And about their differences we shall say that what Western philosophers understand from Hoduth argument, is only "coming into existence in time" (hoduth zamani), and merely uses about world, while what Allamah understand from it, is a "causality hoduth" in three different sphere of world, soul and bodies. "Motion proof" and abstract characteristics of Physics in twentieth century are known as Allameh and western scholars' special reasoning. Beside intellectual and intuitional proofs for the existence of God, there are "empirical proof" that are clearer and more conceivable for ordinary peoples. the present article is going to analyses Allameh Tabatabayi and the twenty century western scholar's empirical proofs for the existence of God.<br />So moreover evaluating the values of both ones, we will explain their differences and similarities. "Design argument", "coming into existence" (hoduth) and the argument which is depend on "evolution theory", are considered as both Allameh and western thinkers' similarities; although both of them have special reasoning in this field. And about their differences we shall say that what Western philosophers understand from Hoduth argument, is only "coming into existence in time" (hoduth zamani), and merely uses about world, while what Allamah understand from it, is a "causality hoduth" in three different sphere of world, soul and bodies. "Motion proof" and abstract characteristics of Physics in twentieth century are known as Allameh and western scholars' special reasoning. https://jpht.ut.ac.ir/article_35496_9e40dbf26a72fff8fc51b6d3574cf320.pdf