University of Tehran PressPhilosophy of Religion2008-70631120041221--11288FAJournal Article19700101This essay attempts to answer a question that whether divine punishment is in harmony whith necessary order of foer- ordination and destiny?
How is possible God who is origin of justice and goodness makes punishment his slaves for their behaviors who goodness makes punishment his slaves for their behaviors who were overpovered fore- ordination and destiny.
If human behaviors were out of fore- ordination and destiny or if, supposedly, God were not worthy to be good and justice would punishment of humans be possible.
According to philosophical and theological rules, author, belived that punishment of sinners is compatible with divine fore- ordination and destiny and justice and goodness.This essay attempts to answer a question that whether divine punishment is in harmony whith necessary order of foer- ordination and destiny?
How is possible God who is origin of justice and goodness makes punishment his slaves for their behaviors who goodness makes punishment his slaves for their behaviors who were overpovered fore- ordination and destiny.
If human behaviors were out of fore- ordination and destiny or if, supposedly, God were not worthy to be good and justice would punishment of humans be possible.
According to philosophical and theological rules, author, belived that punishment of sinners is compatible with divine fore- ordination and destiny and justice and goodness.https://jpht.ut.ac.ir/article_11288_9c5a930090897bef22c9e640dd595784.pdfUniversity of Tehran PressPhilosophy of Religion2008-70631120041221--11289FAJournal Article19700101Auther hold that Islam is in essential different with christianity, because, unlike christianity., Islam invite to rationalism and message of it is but rationality, in recent times.
He put forward several arguments from koran.
He also hold another message of koran to be critical method, because, Faith that can resist aganst doubt is important.Auther hold that Islam is in essential different with christianity, because, unlike christianity., Islam invite to rationalism and message of it is but rationality, in recent times.
He put forward several arguments from koran.
He also hold another message of koran to be critical method, because, Faith that can resist aganst doubt is important.https://jpht.ut.ac.ir/article_11289_3f46ea3a4c9ec61c7a9286b0e71667c1.pdfUniversity of Tehran PressPhilosophy of Religion2008-70631120041221--11290FAJournal Article19700101Aristotle proved from movement charactristics as to be mover through being beloved, rationality, knowledge, everlasting, perfect actuality and he also accepted the most perfect beings about God.
But, Aristotle had doubt concrning oneness and plurality of unmoved movers. He somtimes used word of First on one of These movers and called another movers second and third and ets, and sometimes on all of them.
This essay tries to make explain meaning of First in these usages. Result is that word of First applies in two meanings.Aristotle proved from movement charactristics as to be mover through being beloved, rationality, knowledge, everlasting, perfect actuality and he also accepted the most perfect beings about God.
But, Aristotle had doubt concrning oneness and plurality of unmoved movers. He somtimes used word of First on one of These movers and called another movers second and third and ets, and sometimes on all of them.
This essay tries to make explain meaning of First in these usages. Result is that word of First applies in two meanings.https://jpht.ut.ac.ir/article_11290_0c188d3d6577bc642bfbeca576e0d738.pdfUniversity of Tehran PressPhilosophy of Religion2008-70631120041221--11291FAJournal Article19700101This article discusses relation between religious experience and religious pluralism. Firstly, it attempt to give clear definition on both of them. Religious experience means encounter of person with super natural or seeing of or participating in, them or knowledge that its object is God himself or things and beings connected to God. Religious Pluralism is a way for accounting for variety or plurality of revealed or unrevealed religious and believe that all religious doctrines in various religions are in a way true. Then it is discussed that john Hick who was instigator of religious pluralism in recent times depended it on religious experience and relgious experience on kant's doctrine on phenomenal and noumenal reality.
Then, it is been clear that religious pluralism also involve ones.
In the end, the result is that religious pluralism culminat in agnosticism because Hick held that any human conept can not be related to suprem Reality or in acceptance or accurancy a particular religion.This article discusses relation between religious experience and religious pluralism. Firstly, it attempt to give clear definition on both of them. Religious experience means encounter of person with super natural or seeing of or participating in, them or knowledge that its object is God himself or things and beings connected to God. Religious Pluralism is a way for accounting for variety or plurality of revealed or unrevealed religious and believe that all religious doctrines in various religions are in a way true. Then it is discussed that john Hick who was instigator of religious pluralism in recent times depended it on religious experience and relgious experience on kant's doctrine on phenomenal and noumenal reality.
Then, it is been clear that religious pluralism also involve ones.
In the end, the result is that religious pluralism culminat in agnosticism because Hick held that any human conept can not be related to suprem Reality or in acceptance or accurancy a particular religion.https://jpht.ut.ac.ir/article_11291_cf95f331c1d7d8ffa5b7a9f830747531.pdfUniversity of Tehran PressPhilosophy of Religion2008-70631120041221--11292FAJournal Article19700101The Mind-Body problem is a gaping hole in contemporary philosophy of Mind. The problem briefly is: What is the nature of Mind and how is it related to and united with Body? The same questions had occurred as “Soul-Body” problem within classic western philosophy and Islamic one.
Mulla Sadra and Leibniz who have similar veiws delivering themselves from Avicenna and Descartes problems, try to solve the problem of relation of Soul and Body with more inherent coherency, in their theories.
Leibniz who was known a cartesian philosopher too, and had a critical method, rejected Descartes’ view. He introduced new definitions for Substance, Soul, body and union of Soul and Body to solve the mention problem. His solution to the problem is very near to Mulla Sadra’s. Mulla Sadra represented as a solution to the Avicenna’s problem, several new doctrines which the most important is “generation of the soul is corporal and its conservation is spiritul”.The theorical approximate of Soul and Body, and the. special definition of combinition of Soul and Body,are two common views of Mulla Sadra and Leibniz doctrines.The Mind-Body problem is a gaping hole in contemporary philosophy of Mind. The problem briefly is: What is the nature of Mind and how is it related to and united with Body? The same questions had occurred as “Soul-Body” problem within classic western philosophy and Islamic one.
Mulla Sadra and Leibniz who have similar veiws delivering themselves from Avicenna and Descartes problems, try to solve the problem of relation of Soul and Body with more inherent coherency, in their theories.
Leibniz who was known a cartesian philosopher too, and had a critical method, rejected Descartes’ view. He introduced new definitions for Substance, Soul, body and union of Soul and Body to solve the mention problem. His solution to the problem is very near to Mulla Sadra’s. Mulla Sadra represented as a solution to the Avicenna’s problem, several new doctrines which the most important is “generation of the soul is corporal and its conservation is spiritul”.The theorical approximate of Soul and Body, and the. special definition of combinition of Soul and Body,are two common views of Mulla Sadra and Leibniz doctrines.https://jpht.ut.ac.ir/article_11292_e924b6f5d74b98870b52ee676488ac3f.pdfUniversity of Tehran PressPhilosophy of Religion2008-70631120041221--11293FAJournal Article19700101This essay argues on Humanism in the erea of education. An attempt has been made to reveal its beginning and basis, asserting that no thought could be constituted and developed without being supported and backed by philosophy.
First of all its phenomenology has been scruitinized: this doctrine that necessitates the considering of individual’s phenomenality and self — understanding to visualize his world — cognition has been emphasized. Then we turned to existentialism with the foucus of concern on essentiality and on impressive creature is capable of being self— existent or cause of causes.
These two thoughts as philosophical foundations is succeeded by a third power?
Which holds humanism in special meaning end?
It gives prominence to study the whole man and verifies his existence and phonamanetic aspects.
This essay is search for humanitical education suitable a newcomer who takes contemplating a good occasion.
All endeavors in this survy is to yield a whole notion called humanism, in such a way that its forming layers composed logically.This essay argues on Humanism in the erea of education. An attempt has been made to reveal its beginning and basis, asserting that no thought could be constituted and developed without being supported and backed by philosophy.
First of all its phenomenology has been scruitinized: this doctrine that necessitates the considering of individual’s phenomenality and self — understanding to visualize his world — cognition has been emphasized. Then we turned to existentialism with the foucus of concern on essentiality and on impressive creature is capable of being self— existent or cause of causes.
These two thoughts as philosophical foundations is succeeded by a third power?
Which holds humanism in special meaning end?
It gives prominence to study the whole man and verifies his existence and phonamanetic aspects.
This essay is search for humanitical education suitable a newcomer who takes contemplating a good occasion.
All endeavors in this survy is to yield a whole notion called humanism, in such a way that its forming layers composed logically.https://jpht.ut.ac.ir/article_11293_e9889d27758de5bb6d1fa1d69c069f59.pdfUniversity of Tehran PressPhilosophy of Religion2008-70631120041221--11294FAJournal Article19700101The question concerning the role of reason in morality has been considered greatly by moral philosophers, including David Hume (1711-1776), Scottish significant philosopher. According to flume reason suffers severe Limitations, and it plays only a preliminary or subordinate part in morality, and the main role is allocated to sentiments and passions. However, he was not steadfast to this viewpoint for all times, but sometimes took views contradicated it. Indeed, he has showed, in practice , that reason is to be taken as having a more fundamental part.The question concerning the role of reason in morality has been considered greatly by moral philosophers, including David Hume (1711-1776), Scottish significant philosopher. According to flume reason suffers severe Limitations, and it plays only a preliminary or subordinate part in morality, and the main role is allocated to sentiments and passions. However, he was not steadfast to this viewpoint for all times, but sometimes took views contradicated it. Indeed, he has showed, in practice , that reason is to be taken as having a more fundamental part.https://jpht.ut.ac.ir/article_11294_16160bfaf53d262ab151bff658bd09d1.pdfUniversity of Tehran PressPhilosophy of Religion2008-70631120041221--11295FAJournal Article19700101Knowing of the soul has very important in theology and antrophology. Knowing of soul is one of ways for the existence of God. For Kant, soul cannot be considerd as substance and also cannot given ontological aspecet to it, but it only epistemological and mental aspect.
In according of Kant . “I thing” carry with all our apperceptions but unlike of Descarts “I” is not a fact and self-existence, it is dependent upon my apperception, and also it is a non-content idea.
In this essay, it was most critizied Kant’s idea about substantiality of soul, including, that concepts of substance and accident are amoung philosophical secondary intelligences, not primary ones, as Kant believed. Kant held that understanding of substantiality of soul is by intellectual or sensual or sensual intutions, while there is a third way that is, conceptual knowing.Knowing of the soul has very important in theology and antrophology. Knowing of soul is one of ways for the existence of God. For Kant, soul cannot be considerd as substance and also cannot given ontological aspecet to it, but it only epistemological and mental aspect.
In according of Kant . “I thing” carry with all our apperceptions but unlike of Descarts “I” is not a fact and self-existence, it is dependent upon my apperception, and also it is a non-content idea.
In this essay, it was most critizied Kant’s idea about substantiality of soul, including, that concepts of substance and accident are amoung philosophical secondary intelligences, not primary ones, as Kant believed. Kant held that understanding of substantiality of soul is by intellectual or sensual or sensual intutions, while there is a third way that is, conceptual knowing.https://jpht.ut.ac.ir/article_11295_cbaa23941a105b1823c3f0e745639a64.pdf