This article examines the relationship between miracles and the problem of evil from the perspective of Robert Larmer, a contemporary philosopher of religion. By providing a rational explanation of miracles, Larmer seeks to demonstrate that belief in miracles is not only compatible with rationality but can also withstand challenges arising from the problem of evil. Critics such as Basinger, Overall, Keller, and Hume argue that the existence of evil calls into question the possibility of miracles, viewing them as indicative of moral evil on God's part, a flaw in divine creation, or theological evil. In response to these critics and drawing on Christian theology, Larmer argues that natural and moral evils are compatible with Christian theology, and that belief in the occurrence of miracles does not lead to theological or moral evil. This is because miracles are manifestations of divine will aimed at achieving the highest good, namely the spiritual growth of humans, and are dependent on specific conditions. Furthermore, by proposing criteria for identifying miracles, he attempts to show that the occurrence of a miracle does not undermine human understanding of nature or human moral responsibility. The article concludes that although Larmer's responses to some criticisms are vulnerable, his overall approach can be defended using the perspectives of Islamic theologians. His general approach provides a coherent picture of the relationship between miracles and evil that is useful for the rational defense of religious faith.