Comparative Research about meaning of life in Sartre and Nagel

Articles in Press

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 M.A student in philosophy, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran

2 Associate Professor in philosophy, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran

Abstract

The question of the meaning of life is a practical inquiry deeply intertwined with human existence, manifesting within the frameworks of both analytical and continental philosophy. This article examines the perspectives of Thomas Nagel and Jean-Paul Sartre on this topic. In analyzing Nagel’s views, we explore the intrinsic value of life and his assertion that death is inherently an evil. Nagel proposes two perspectives: an objective, external viewpoint that deems life trivial and insignificant, and a subjective, internal viewpoint that considers life profoundly valuable. The clash between these two perspectives gives rise to a sense of the absurd. While this feeling cannot be eradicated, Nagel suggests confronting it with irony, allowing one to continue living practically. Conversely, Sartre argues that no objective meaning, value, or ethical principles exist outside of human creation, nor does humanity possess a predetermined essence. Instead, humans are endowed with absolute freedom to forge their own identity, thereby creating meaning, value, and ethics for their lives. This article aims to critically analyze and evaluate the aforementioned views of Nagel and Sartre.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Philosophy of Religion

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 15 February 2026

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics