A Critical Examination of the Deconstructive Thinking of Jacques Derrida in the Philosophy of Religion Based on the Views of Allameh Tabataba’i

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD Student, Department of Philosophy, Shahid Motahhari University, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

The present article is a critical examination of the deconstructive thinking of Derrida in the domain of the philosophy of religion based on the opinions of Allameh Tabataba’i. Derrida’s theology – with its deconstructive approach to the philosophy of religion – never wants to achieve truth in its exploration of the issues of the philosophy of religion such as the existence of God. The reason is that Derrida does not believe in the existence of a truth that is disclosed to the human through the demonstrative method. In his opinion, an emphasis on the mysteriousness can guarantee the endurance of the religious matter. Although Allameh, too, acknowledges the limitedness of the human mind in the domain of the divine philosophy, he does not give up on the use of the unified and systematic thinking as well as the intellectual arguments to discover the truth of the religious matter. Epistemic pluralism, instability of meaning, and the gradation of self-evidence are some of the problems of Derrida’s thought. Allameh believes that truth has a unified structure that can be discovered by the human through his constant intellectual practice. He never accepts Derrida’s relativist view to reality, and believes that the path of knowledge in the philosophy of religion goes through the absoluteness and universality of reality.

Keywords

References

  1. تریگ، راجر (1382). دیدگاه‌هایی دربارۀ سرشت آدمی، ترجمۀ جمعی از مترجمان، تهران: پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی.
  2. دریدا، ژاک (1395). بر سر کوه موریه، ترجمۀ مینا جعفری ثابت، تهران: چترنگ.
  3. ـــــــــ (1396). نوشتار و تفاوت، ترجمۀ عبدالکریم رشیدیان، تهران: نشر نی.
  4. ضیمران، محمد (1379). ژاک دریدا و متافیزیک حضور، تهران: هرمس.
  5. طباطبایی، محمد حسین (1374). بدایه الحکمه، ترجمۀ علی شیروانی، تهران: انتشارات الزهرا.
  6. ــــــــــــــــــــــ (1393). اصول فلسفه و روش رئالیسم، تهران: صدرا.
  7. ــــــــــــــــــــــ (1404 ق). نهایه الحکمه، قم: مؤسسۀ الانتشارات التابعه لجماعه المدرسین.
  8. ــــــــــــــــــــــ (1417 ق). المیزان، جلد 1، قم: جامعۀ مدرسین حوزۀ علمیۀ قم.
  9. ــــــــــــــــــــــ (1388). مجموعه رسایل، جلد 2، قم: بوستان کتاب.
  10. کپیوتو، جان دی (1388). اینک دین، ترجمۀ مرضیه سلیمانی، تهران: نشر علم.
  11. کیوپیت، دان (1376). دریای ایمان، ترجمۀ حسن کامشاد، تهران: طرح نو.
    1. Charlesworth, Max (2002). Philosophy and Religion from plato to postmodernism, England, one world publications.
    2. Derrida, Jacques (1981). Positions, trans, A, Bass, chicago university of chicagopress.
    3. (1976). of Grammatology, trans, Gayatri. ChakravortySpirak, Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University press.
    4. -------------------- (1995). On the name,edited by Thomas Dutoit, united state, stanford university press.
    5. -------------------- (2002). Act of religion, edited by Gil Anidjar, New York, Routledge.
    6. Nietzsche, Friedrich (1962). Philosophy in the Tragic Age of th Greeks, Translated by Marianne cowan, washington, DC, Regnery Publishing.
    7. Sweetman, Brendan (1999). Postmodernism, Derrida and Difference, A critique, International Philosophical Quarterly, No.1,pp 5-18.
Philosophy of Religion
Volume 16, Issue 4
January 2020
Pages 697-715

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics