The Basis of Virtue in Spinoza’s Thought

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Theology, College of Farabi, University of Tehran, Qom, Iran

2 MSc, Institute for Humanities and Social Sciences, ACECR, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Spinoza, the rationalist philosopher of the 17th century, believed that philosophy and science must be used to attain human perfection. As a result, he focused on making an intellectual system the ultimate goal of which for him was bliss, one which was based on the virtuous life. In this article, we try to understand the reality of virtue and its metaphysical and anthropological foundations in Spinoza’s philosophy. This study is based on the descriptive-analytical method and uses the philosophical approach for the specification of the question at hand. In brief, the study shows that Spinoza’s understanding of virtue is based on the unity of substance, the identity of substance/God and infinite power, the similarity between cause and effect, naturalism, parallelism of mind and body, and rationalism. He synthesizes some aspects of platonic, Aristotelian, hedonistic, utilitarian, stoic, and Hobbesian views and identifies true virtue with power (conatus), activity and rationality. He puts the rational knowledge about God and rational love to Him at the core of his theory. It is on the basis of this understanding that the human being can overcome his emotional passions and achieve stability.

Keywords

References

  1. اسپینوزا، باروخ (1374). رساله در اصلاح فاهمه، ترجمۀ اسماعیل سعادت، تهران: مرکز نشر دانشگاهی.
  2. ـــــــــــــ (1376). اخلاق، ترجمۀ محسن جهانگیری، تهران: مرکز نشر دانشگاهی.
  3. برنجکار، رضا (1382). نتایج اخلاقی و حقوقی نظریۀ فلسفی اسپینوزا، اندیشه‌های حقوقی، 4، 47 - 61.
  4. پارکینسون، جورج (1381). عقل و تجربه در اسپینوزا، ترجمۀ محمدعلی عبداللهی، قم: بوستان کتاب قم.
  5. ــــــــــــــــــ (1386). نظریه شناخت اسپینوزا، ترجمۀ مسعود سیف، تهران: انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی.
  6. توازیانی، زهره (1386). مقایسۀ دیدگاه ابن‌سینا و اسپینوزا در نسبت عقل، اراده و اختیار به خدا، فصلنامۀ اندیشۀ دینی دانشگاه شیراز، 24: 47 - 68.
  7. جهانگیری، محسن (1379). اختیار و مسائل مربوط به آن در فلسفۀ اسپینوزا، مجلۀ دانشکدۀ ادبیات دانشگاه تهران، 2: 62 - 83.
    1. Allison, H. (1987). Benedict de Spinoza: An Introduction, Yale.
    2. Bennett, J. (1984). A Study of Spinoza's Ethics, Indianapolis.
    3. Bidney, D. (1940). The Psychology and Ethics of Spinoza, yale.
    4. Bowman, C. (1967). “Spinoza’s Doctrine of Attributes”, Southern Journal of Philosophy, 5(1), 59-71.
    5. Broad, C. D. (1967). Five Types of Ethical Theory, Routledge.
    6. Carr, S. (1978). Spinoza’s Distinction Between Rational and Intuitive Knowledge, The Philosophucal Review, 87(2), 241-252.
    7. Carierro, J. (2014). “Spinoza, the Will, and the Ontology of Power”, in Melamed, Yitzhak (edi: 2014): The Young Spinoza, Oxford, 160-182.
    8. Curley, E. (1973). Spinoza’s Moral Philosophy, in Grene, Marjorie (edi:1973): Spinoza: A Collection of Critical Essays, New York, 354-376.
    9. ---------------  (1988). Behind the Geometrical Method, Princeton.
    10. Delahunty, R. G. (1985). spinoza, routledge.
    11. Descartes (1984-85). The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, Trans by Cottingham, Vol 1 & 2, Cambridge.
    12. --------------- (1991). The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, Trans by Cottingham, Vol 3, Cambridge.
    13. Deveaux, S. (2003). The Divine Essence and the Conception of God in Spinoza, Synthese, 135(3), 329-338.
    14. Frankena, W. (1975). Spinoza’s New morality, in Freeman, Eugene; Mandelbaum, Maurice (edi:1975): Spinoza: Essays in Interpretation, Open Court Pub, 85-100.
    15. Garrett, D. (1996). Spinoza’s Ethical Theory, in Garrett, Don(edi:1996): The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza , Cambridge, 267-314.
    16. ـــــــــــــــــ(2002). Spinoza’s Conatus Argument, in Koistinen, Olli & Biro, John (edi:2002): Spinoza: Metaphysical Themes, Oxford, 127-158.
    17. Hampshire, S. (1951). Spinoza, Penguin Books.
    18. Hart, A. (1983). Spinoza’s Ethics: Part I and II, Leiden.
    19. Jacob, J. (2010). The Ancient noion of self-Reservation, Cambridge.
    20. Leibniz, G. W. (1989). Philosophical Papers and Letters, Trans by Leroy  Loemker, Boston.
    21. Marshall, E. (2008). Adequacy and Innateness in Spinoza, in Garber, Daniel(edi:2008): Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy, Vol 4, Oxford, pp.51-88.
    22. Martens, S. (1978). Spinoza on Attributes, Synthese Journal, 3(7), 101-111.
    23. Nadler, S. (2006). Spinoza’s Ethics: An Introduction, Cambridge.
    24. Radner, D. (1971). Spinoza’s Theory of Idea, The Philosophical Review, 80(3), 338-359.
    25. Rocca, M. D. (1996). Spinoza’s Metaphysical Psychology, in Garrett, Don(edi:1996): The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza, Cambridge, pp.192-266.
    26. ــــــــــــــــــــــ(2001). Spinoza’s Argument for Identity Theory, in Lloyd, Genevieve(edi:2001): Spinoza: Critical Assessments, Vol 1, Routledge, pp.140-164.
    27. Rocca, M. D. (2008). Spinoza, Routledge.
    28. Spinoza, B. (1972). Spinoza Opera, 5 Vols, edited by Carl Gebhardt, Heidelberg.
    29. ـــــــــــــــــ. (2002). Complete Works, Trans by Samuel Shirley, Cambridge.
    30. Steinberg, D. (2000). On Spinoza, Australia.
    31. Wilson, M. (1996). Spinoza’s Theory of Knowledge, in Garrett, D(edi:1996): The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza , Cambridge, pp.89-141.
    32. Wolfson, H. (1934). The Philosophy of Spinoza, 2 Vols, Harvard.
    33. Woolhouse, R. S. (1993). The Concept of Substance in Seventeenth Century, Routledge.
Philosophy of Religion
Volume 17, Issue 1
April 2020
Pages 163-187

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics