The discussion on compulsion and volition is one of the most important issues in the history of human thinking. It has always been a point of dispute for a wide range of scholarly opinions. The main question here is that if the belief in the a priori coordination principle does not in a way reject volition and primacy of necessity. How is the eternal Divine volition congruent with the human volition? As one of the greatest philosophers of the pre-Kantian era, Leibniz tried to establish the human volition by distinguishing the absolute and conditional necessity as well as adopting the “Best of all possible worlds” theory. On the other hand, Allamah Tabataba’i considers volition as an innate matter and maintains that the principle of “any possible being is in need of another being for its existence” does not contradict the human volition. In this study, in addition to expressing the principles adopted by Leibniz and Allamah Tabataba’i, the viewpoint of the former is criticized. The important considerations here are the presentation, comparison, analysis, and examination of the viewpoints of these two thinkers.
15. لایبنیتس، گوتفرید ویلهلم (1372). مونادولوژی و چند مقالۀ فلسفی دیگر، ترجمۀ عبدالکریم رشیدیان،تهران: انتشارات و آموزش انقلاب اسلامی.
Latta , Robert (1898). Leibniz the monadology and other philosophical, writings oxford university press, London.
Leibniz، G.W (1985). theodicy, essays on the goodness of god, the freedom of man and the origion of evil, translated E.M. huggard, from c.j. gerhardts edition of the collected philosophical
---------------- (1988). Discourse on metaphysics and related, writings edit & trans. R. N. D martin & S. Brown manchester university press u.s.A.
----------------- (1982). new Essay on Human understand, Abridged Edition translated Edited by peter Remants Jonatan Benntaphisics cambrige university .
-------------------- (1956). philosophical papers and letters translated and edited by loemker, L. E, Routledge.
Blumenfeld .(1988). freedom .contingency and things possible in jhemselves in Woolhouse . R. S. 1994, G. W. Leibniz critical Assessments Routledge. London.
Bathay,S H , kheidani,L , Fallahi,A H and Aghajani Ghannad,M R . (2020). A Comparative Study of the Compulsion and Volition Discussion from the Viewpoint of Leibniz and Allamah Tabataba’i. Philosophy of Religion, 17(2), 317-342. doi: 10.22059/jpht.2019.286828.1005685
MLA
Bathay,S H , , kheidani,L , , Fallahi,A H , and Aghajani Ghannad,M R . "A Comparative Study of the Compulsion and Volition Discussion from the Viewpoint of Leibniz and Allamah Tabataba’i", Philosophy of Religion, 17, 2, 2020, 317-342. doi: 10.22059/jpht.2019.286828.1005685
HARVARD
Bathay S H, kheidani L, Fallahi A H, Aghajani Ghannad M R. (2020). 'A Comparative Study of the Compulsion and Volition Discussion from the Viewpoint of Leibniz and Allamah Tabataba’i', Philosophy of Religion, 17(2), pp. 317-342. doi: 10.22059/jpht.2019.286828.1005685
CHICAGO
S H Bathay, L kheidani, A H Fallahi and M R Aghajani Ghannad, "A Comparative Study of the Compulsion and Volition Discussion from the Viewpoint of Leibniz and Allamah Tabataba’i," Philosophy of Religion, 17 2 (2020): 317-342, doi: 10.22059/jpht.2019.286828.1005685
VANCOUVER
Bathay S H, kheidani L, Fallahi A H, Aghajani Ghannad M R. A Comparative Study of the Compulsion and Volition Discussion from the Viewpoint of Leibniz and Allamah Tabataba’i. Philosophy of Religion. 2020;17(2):317-342 (In Persian). doi: 10.22059/jpht.2019.286828.1005685
