The Rejection of the Belief in the Existence of God and the Different Solution Offered by Virtue-based Epistemology

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Assistant Professor, Department of Islamic Philosophy and Theology, Almustafa International University, Mashhad Branch, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

The intelligibility of the belief in the existence of God is the most important issue in religious epistemology. Zagzebski’s conception of virtue-based epistemology both criticizes the externalist and individualist viewpoints of reformed epistemology and emphasizes the voluntariness of the belief and its influence by the community. In this stance, the authoritativeness of the religious belief is explained based on the virtue of “epistemic trust” on oneself and other members of the epistemic community. Therefore, the believers’ belief in the existence of God at different times and places can be the basis of the authoritativeness of one’s belief in the existence of God. This issue has been explained via an argumentation that indicates the superiority of epistemic universality over epistemic self-determinism and epistemic self-centrism.

Keywords

References

  1. زاگزبسکی، لیندا (1392). معرفت‌شناسی، ترجمۀ کاوه بهبهانی، تهران: نی.
    1. Benton, M ;(2014). Believing on authority. European journal for philosophy of religion, December, p 1-14.
    2.   DePaul, M; Zagzebski, L ;(2003). Ethical and Intellectual Virtue: Perspectives from Ethics and Epistemology, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    3. Plantinga, A ;(1982). The Reformed Objection to Natural Theology. Christian Scholar Review, 11(3), p 196.
    4. ـــــــــــــــــ(2000). Warranted Christian Belief, New York: Oxford University Press.
    5. Zagzebski, L ;(1993). Religious Knowledge and Virtues of the Mind, in Rational Faith: Catholic Responses to Reformed Epistemology, University of Notre Dame Press, 199-225.
    6. ــــــــــــــــــــ (2010). Exemplarist virtue theory, Metaphilosophy, 41(1-2), 41-56.
    7. ــــــــــــــــــــ (2012). Religious Authority, in: Epistemic Authority: A Theory of Trust, Authority, and Autonomy in Belief, Oxford University Press; 181-203
    8. ــــــــــــــــــــ (2013) A Defense of Epistemic Authority, Res philosophica, 90(2),293-306.

10. ــــــــــــــــــــ (2001). A virtue epistemology: essays on epistemic virtue and responsibility, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

11. ــــــــــــــــــــ (1997). Virtue in Ethics and Epistemology, Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association, 71, 1-17.

12. ــــــــــــــــــــ (2000). From Reliabilism to Virtue Epistemology, the Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy, 5, 173-179.

13. ــــــــــــــــــــ Is it reasonable to believed God? True Family lecture, St. Thomas More, 6-20.

14. ــــــــــــــــــــ (1996) Virtues of the Mind: An Inquiry into the Nature of Virtue and the Ethical Foundations of Knowledge, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Philosophy of Religion
Volume 17, Issue 2
July 2020
Pages 213-234

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics