An Evaluation and Criticism of the Viewpoints of Socrates and Epicurus about the Fearsomeness of Death Based on the Theories of Harm

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Assistant Professor, Department of Islamic Education, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran

Abstract

As an existential concern of all humans, fear of death has for long grabbed the attention of death thinkers such as Socrates and Epicurus. Socrates deems death as a dreamless sleep and a kind of locational displacement of self, while Epicurus tries to prove harmlessness of death by arguing for non-existence of life after death and lack of any perception after it. The common aspect in the thoughts of these two thinkers is their view to death as something void of perception. However, Socrates does not abandon his belief in eternity and considers lack of perception as transient and only limited to the death event. He likens death to a dreamless sleep to reduce the humans’ fear of death. The main question of the study at hand is that if the non-existence of a person and its ensuing lack of perception reject the possibility of the harm to a deceased person. Some critical theorists believe that death is a kind of harm and damage. Taking into account the theories on the harmfulness of death before (deactivating the passions) and after (frustration and deprivation) it occurs, it seems that death entails a level of harm and damage, and the assumptions and results achieved by Socrates and Epicurus have a lot of problems. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the different solutions offered by these two thinkers through the theories favoring the harmfulness of death. Since there has been no study so far on the relationship between understanding the harmfulness of death and the fear that derives from it, this paper offers a new philosophical stance.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. حمیدی‌فرد، فاطمه؛ یوسفی، علی‌رضا؛ کشتی‌آرای، نرگس (1398). حقیقت مرگ در قرآن و دلایل ترس از آن از دیدگاه امام علی(ع) در نهج‌البلاغه»، مطالعات قرآنی، سال دهم، ش 40، ص 250-231.
  2. سلیمانی، فاطمه (1387). «ترس از مرگ با تکیه بر دیدگاه ابن‌سینا و ملاصدرا»، حکمت سینوی، سال دوازدهم، ش 40.ص 26-1.
  3. افلاطون (1380). دورۀ آثار افلاطون، ترجمۀ محمدحسن لطفی، تهران: خوارزمی.
  4. B; Feldman.F; Johansson.J (2012). The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Death. Oxford: Oxford University Press.[DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/97801953 88923.001.0001]
  5. Epicurus, B. (2004). Letter to Menoeceus (p. 45). University of Adelaide Library.
  6. Grey, WilLiam (1999). Epicurus and the harm of death. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 77 issue 3.[doi 10.1080_00048409912349121]
  7. Glover, J. (1990). Causing death and saving lives: The moral problems of abortion, infanticide, suicide, euthanasia, capital punishment, war and other life-or-death choices, Penguin UK.‌
  8. Grander, W., Schwaiger, J., Seeber, J., & Dünser, M. W. (2011). “Cyber war—When virtual fear of death turns into a real threat of life”, International Journal of Cardiology, Vol.149, No.1, e16-e17.‌
  9. Kamm, F. M (1998). Death and Whom to Save From It. New York: Oxford University press.
  10. Luper, Steven (2009). The Philosophy of Death, New York : cambridge university press, ISBN 978-0-521-70912-5.
  11. LI, Jack (2002).Can Death Be A Harm To The Person Who Die?.Series: Philosophy and Medicine 73, PubLisher:Springer Netherlands. ISBN: 978-90-481-5973-4,978-94-015-9868-24.
  12. Lamont, JuLian (1998). “A solution to the puzzle of when death harms its victims”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 76 issue 2 .[doi 10.1080_00048409812348351]

13.  Luper, Steven (2019). DEATH.{Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy https://plato.stanford.edu/archives /win2019 /entries /death/}

  1. Ahrensdorf, P. J. (1995). The death of Socrates and the life of philosophy: an interpretation of Plato's Phaedo. SUNY press.‌
  2. Ochsmann, R. (1984). “Belief in afterlife as a moderator of fear of death?”, European Journal of Social Psychology, Vol.14, No.1, pp.53-67.‌
  3. Vancamp, B. (1997). “Gregory Vlastos, Studies in Greek Philosophy”, II: Socrates, Plato, and Their Tradition, Edited by DW Graham. L'Antiquité Classique, Vol.66, No.1, pp.488-489.‌
  4. Bradley, B. (2009). Well-being and death, OUP Oxford.‌
  5. Brickhouse, T. C., & Smith, N. D. (2004). Routledge philosophy guidebook to Plato and the trial of Socrates, Routledge.
Philosophy of Religion
Volume 19, Issue 1
April 2022
Pages 127-150

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics