A comparative evaluation of the validity of »Argument of order« from the point of view of Shahid Sadr and Shahid Motahari

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. student of Theoretical Foundations of Islam, Department of Theoretical Foundations of Islam, Faculty of Islamic Education and Thought, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Theoretical Foundations of Islam, Faculty of Islamic Education and Thought, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Argument of order, with different interpretations and from different perspectives, has been noticed by scientists. Islamic thinkers disagree about the value of this argument. Some philosophers believe that arguments based on order have no Argumentative value and they do not have enough strength to prove and recognize God. In return, a group of theologians have defended this argument and emphasized its special advantages. This research, with a descriptive-analytical and critical method, has evaluated the validity of this argument as the most general way of knowing God from the point of view of these two great thinkers. In this way, it is possible to know God with the reasons that have the highest level of perfection. As a result, Shahid Sadr's interpretation of the proof of order is based on the theory he adopted in epistemology and considering the problems faced by other interpretations of the order argument, including the interpretation based on "rational logic", It seems that the way proposed by Martyr Sadr is the best way to validate the order argument as a precise philosophical argument.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

قرآن کریم
ارسطو (1980). منطق ارسطو. بیروت: دارالقلم.
جوادی آملی، عبدالله (1370). شناخت‌شناسی در قرآن. قم: مرکز مدیریت حوزه علمیه قم.
ــــــــــــــــــــ (1386). تبیین براهین اثبات خدا. قم: مرکز نشر اسراء.
خسروپناه، عبدالحسین (1383). منطق استقرا از دیدگاه شهید صدر. ذهن، شماره 18، 29 ـ 58.
راسل، برتراند (1356). مسائل فلسفه. مترجم: منوچهر بزرگمهر. تهران: خوارزمی.
سبحانی تبریزی، جعفر (1387). نظریه المعرفه. قم: مؤسسه امام صادق(ع).
صدر، محمدباقر (1359). مبانی منطقی استقرا. مترجم: احمد فهری زنجانی. تهران: پیام آزادی.
ــــــــــــــ (1361). المرسل الرسول الرساله. قم: الرضی.
صدرالدین شیرازی، محمد (1354). مبدأ و معاد. تهران: انجمن حکمت و فلسفه ایران.
طباطبایی، محمدحسین (1371).  المیزان فی تفسیر القرآن. قم: اسماعیلیان.
ــــــــــــــــــــــــ (1415). نهایه الحکمه. قم: مؤسسه نشر اسلامی.
عشریه، رحمان و اسماعیلی، محمدعلی (1393). کاربرد دلیل استقرایی در علم اصول در اندیشه شهید صدر. مطالعات اصول فقه امامیه، دوره 93، شماره 1، 97 ـ 124.
لاهوتیان، حسن (1399). رهاوردهای نظریه توالد ذاتی شهید صدر. ذهن، شماره 81، 35 ـ 61.
مصباح یزدی، محمدتقی (1384). شرح برهان شفاء. قم: مؤسسه آموزشی و پژوهشی امام خمینی.
مطهری، مرتضی (1373). توحید. تهران: صدرا.
ـــــــــــــــ (1375). علل گرایش به مادی‌گری. تهران: صدرا.
ـــــــــــــــ (1387). مسئله شناخت. تهران: صدرا.
ـــــــــــــــ (1389). مجموعه آثار. تهران: صدرا.
ـــــــــــــــ (1390). اصول فلسفه و روش رئالیسم. تهران: صدرا.
هیوم، دیوید (1395). کاوشی در خصوص فهم بشری. مترجم: کاوه لاجوردی. تهران: مرکز.
The Holy Qur'an
Aristotle )1980(. Aristotle's Logic. Badavi, Abdulrahman. Beirut: Dar al-Qalam. (in Arabic)
Ashriya, R. & Ismaili, M.A. (2014). The Use of Inductive Reasoning in the Science of Principles Jurisprudence in the Thought of Mohammad Bagher Sadr. Biquarterly Journal of Promotion of Imamiyah Principles of Jurisprudence, 93 (1), 97-124. (in Persion)
Javadi Amoli, A. (1991). Epistemology in the Qur'an. Qom: Qom Seminary Management Center. (in Persian)
------------------- (2016). Explaining the Proofs of God's Existence. Qom: Esra Publishing Center. (in Persian)
Khosrupanah, A.H. (2013). The Logic of Induction from the Point of View of Mohammad Baqir Sadr. Zehn, 5(2) 18, 29-58. (in Persian)
Lahutian, H. (2019). The Results of the Innate Borning Theory of Mohammad Bagher Sadr. Zehn, 21(1), 35-61. (in Persion)
Mesbah Yazdi, M.T. (2005). Explanation of Proof of Healing by Avicenna. Qom: Imam Khomeini Educational and Research Institute. (in Persion)
Mill, J. S. (1930). A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inducti, Book III. Of Indoction. London: Longmans.
Motahari, M. (1994). Oneness (Towhid). Tehran: Sadra. (in Persion)
---------------- (2008). The Question of Knowledge. Tehran: Sadra. (in Persion)
---------------- (2010). Collection of Books. Tehran: Sadra. (in Persion)
---------------- (2011). The Principles of Philosophy and the Method of Realism. Tehran: Sadra. (in Persion)
Sadr, M.B. (1980). Logical Bases of Induction. Translator: Ahmad Fehri Zanjani. Tehran: Payam Azadi. (in Persian)
-------------- (1982). Al-Mursal Al-Rasul Al-Risalah. Qom: Al-Razi. (in Arabic)
Sadr al-Din Shirazi, M. b. I. (1975). Origin and Resurrection. Tehran: Iranian Wisdom and Philosophy Society. (in Persion)
Sobhani, J. (2008). The Theory of Knowledge. Qom: Institute of Imam Sadiq. (in Persian)
Tabatabai, M.H. (1992). Al-Mizan. Qom: Ismailian. (in Arabic)
------------------- (1994). Nahayat al-hekmah. Qom: Islamic Publishing Institute. (in Arabic)
Philosophy of Religion
Volume 20, Issue 4
January 2024
Pages 287-298

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics