New Atheism and Rationalism: Using an unjustified methodology

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Department of Philosophy and Mysticism, Faculty of Philosophy and Religious Studies, al-Mustafa International University, Qom, Iran

10.22059/jpht.2024.370749.1006026

Abstract

New atheism is a new movement that has been active since the beginning of this century. This movement, founded by thinkers, such as Dawkins, Dennet, Sam Harris and Hitchens, has used fundamental concepts such as rationalism to justify its principles. The founders of this movement have tried to use this fundamental concept to make atheism appear rational, and belief in God completely irrational. They have done this by stating the merits and benefits of disbelief in God and the disadvantages and harms of belief in God. In this article, which is written in an analytical-descriptive way, we aim to critique rationalism. For this purpose, first we get to know what rationalism is. Then we will show how the new atheists have used this concept in favor of atheism and in rejecting theism. In the end, relying on the thoughts of philosophers, we will critique rationalism. Rationalism as another reading of scientism, rationalism as another interpretation of profit maximization, rationalism as the ground for separating knowledge from value, and rationalism as a school that does not pay attention to its goals are just some of the criticisms that have been made against this school. Taking these criticisms into account, all the problems that affect scientism, utilitarianism, and the view of separating knowledge from value will also affect this school. With this description, this school cannot be a good justification for the new atheism.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

ابن‌سینا، حسین بن عبدالله (1404 ق). الشفاء (المنطق). قم: مکتبه آیت‌الله المرعشی.
ارمسون، جی. ای. (1382). تفسیر فلسفة اخلاق جان استوارت میل، نظریه‏های فلسفة اخلاق. مترجم: حسین کاجی. تهران: روزنه.
برنارد، ویلیام (1374). عقل‏گرایی. مترجم: محمدتقی سبحانی. نقد و نظر، ش 2، (ص 109-128)
پاپکین، ریچارد (1385). کلیات فلسفه. مترجم: سید جلال‏الدین مجتبوی. تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
بیات، عبدالرسول و دیگران (1381). فرهنگ واژه‏ها. قم: مؤسسة اندیشه و فرهنگ دینی.
پارکینسن، ج. اچ. آر. (1381). عقل و تجربه از نظر اسپینوزا. مترجم: محمدعلی عبداللهی. قم: بوستان کتاب.
پترسون، مایکل و دیگران (1387). عقل و اعتقاد دینی. مترجم: احمد نراقی و ... تهران: تهران نو.
تیلمان، اورس (1362). ماهیت دولت در جهان سوم. مترجم: بهروز توانمند. تهران: آگاه.
جوادی، محسن (1375). مسئلة باید و هست. قم: بوستان کتاب.
راسل، برتراند (1393). جهان‌بینی علمی. مترجم: حسن منصور. تهران: آگاه.
سروش، عبدالکریم (1385). اسلام و علوم اجتماعی، نقدی بر دینی کردن علم. قم: پژوهشگاه حوزه و دانشگاه.
فولکیه، پل (1370). مابعدالطبیعه. مترجم: یحیی مهدوی. تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
کاپلستون، فردریک (1385). تاریخ فلسفه از دکارت تا لایب‌نیتس. مترجم: غلام‌رضا اعوانی. تهران: سروش.
کاظم‏زاده، فیروز (1371). روس و انگلیس در ایران. مترجم: منوچهر امیری. تهران: انقلاب اسلامی.
مری، وارنوک (1380). فلسفة اخلاق در قرن بیستم. مترجم: ابوالقاسم فنایی. قم: بوستان کتاب.
مصباح‌یزدی، محمدتقی (1379). آموزش فلسفه. تهران: شرکت چاپ و نشر بین‌الملل سازمان تبلیغات اسلامی. ج 1 و 2.
وال، ژان (1370). بحث در مابعدالطبیعه. مترجم: یحیی مهدوی. تهران: خوارزمی.
ولایتی، علی‏اکبر (1390). فرهنگ و تمدن اسلامی. چ 30. قم: نهاد نمایندگی ولی‌فقیه در دانشگاه‏ها.
هابرماس، یورگن (1380). جهانى ‌شدن و آیندة دموکراسى. مترجم: کمال پولادى. تهران: مرکز.
Bernard, W. (1967). Rationalism in The Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Ed. Paul Edwards. London: Collier Macmillan Publishers. Vol. 7.
Bolis, I., Morioka, S. N., & Sznelwar, L. I. (2017). Are we making decisions in a sustainable way? A comprehensive literature review about rationalities for sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 145, 310-322.
Bourdeau, M. (2023). Auguste Comte, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2023 Edition). Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman (eds.). URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2023/entries/comte/>.
Bristow, W. (2013). Enlightenment, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2023 Edition). Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman (eds.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/ fall2023/entries/enlightenment/>.
Crisp, R. (1997). Mill on Utilitarianism. London & New York: Routledge.
Dawkins, R. (2006). The God Delusion. London: Bantam Press.
Dennet, D. C. (2006). Breaking the Spell- Religion as a Natural Phenomenon. New York: Penguin Group.
Harris, S. (2004). The End of Faith: Religion, Terror, and the Future of Reason. New York: Norton.
Driver, J. (2022). The History of Utilitarianism, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2022 Edition). Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman (eds.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2022/entries/utilitarianism-history/>.
Eggleston, B. (2006). Mill's Utilitarianism. Cambridge Companion to Mill. John Skorupski (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hitchens, C. (2007). God Is Not Great: Religion Poisons Everything. New York: Hachette Twelve.
http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/doc/filozofia/2014/8/687-696.pdf)
https://academic.oup.com/clinchem/article/62/5/789/5611779
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Bernard-Le-Bovier-sieur-de-Fontenelle
https://www.justiceinfo.net/en/79636-colonial-crimes-the-empire-on-which-justice-almost-never-sets.html
https://www.magiran.com/article/4258370
https://www.sydneycriminallawyers.com.au/blog/crimes-against-humanity-the-british-empire/
Hume, D. (2009). A Treatise of Human Nature [Waiheke Island]. Floating Press.
Shank, J.B. Voltaire available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/voltaire/
lity %20 in %20 capitalism %20 is %20 supposed, century %2 C %20 especially %20 by %20 liberal %20 traditions.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/rationalism/Epistemological-rationalism-in-modern-philosophies
Markie, P. (1998). Rationalism in Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 10 volumes set. Ed. Edwards Craig. London: Routledge. PDF, 7191.
Markie, P. Rationalism vs. Empiricism, available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/rationalism-empiricism/
Rescher, N. (1984). The Limits of Science. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Rosenberg, A. (2011). The Atheist’s Guide to Reality: Enjoying Life without Illusions. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.
Russell, B. Human Society in Ethics and Politics. Allen and Unwin.
Sorell, T. T. (2013). Scientism: Philosophy and the Infatuation with Science. London: Routledge.
Stenmark, M. (1995). Rationality in Science, Religion, and Everyday Life. University of Notre Dame Press.
Zenk, T. (2013). New Atheism in The Oxford Handbook of Atheism. Ed. Stepphen Bullivant & Michael Ruse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
 
Philosophy of Religion
Volume 21, Issue 2
July 2024
Pages 103-116

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics