A Critical Review of the Approach of Open Theism in Solving the Problem of Evil

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Islamic Philosophy and Theology, Faculty of Theology, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran

2 Department of Islamic Philosophy and Theology, Faculty of Theology, College of Farabi, University of Tehran, Qom, Iran

10.22059/jpht.2024.381972.1006072

Abstract

Every new school and method in theology and philosophy of religion has to address the different issues that believers face in order to demonstrate its comprehensiveness and coherence. Open theism has attempted in this direction and offered its answers to these problems based on the theory of openness. It emerged in protest against the incompatibility of classical theism with the Bible and its overreliance on metaphysics and Greek philosophy. Using a reductionist view of God's power and a defensive system grounded on love, open theologians attempted to address the issue of evil while reframing God's relationship with the world. However, their strategy in this regard is heavily criticized, meaning that they have failed to attribute love to God in addition to denying His authority to compel. The other major critiques brought against their position are a return to classical theology and the existence of a paradox in the concept of gratuitous evil. Through the use of descriptive and analytical methods, the open theistic approach to resolving the evidential problem of evil is analyzed and critiqued in this study. Despite the small number of studies that have been conducted on this theological school, their perspective and method for addressing the issue of evil have not yet been reviewed; this significant finding is made in the current study.

Keywords

Main Subjects


پلانتینگا، آلوین (1384). فلسفة دین؛ خدا، اختیار و شر. ترجمه و توضیح: محمد سعیدی‌مهر. تهران: طه.
جی. ال. مکی و همکاران (1384). کلام فلسفی (مجموعه مقالات). مترجم: احمد نراقی و ابراهیم سلطانی. تهران: صراط.
دیباجی، سید محمدعلی و محمدی‌نیا، عیسی (1398). نقد و بررسی نسبت علم الهی با اختیار انسان در الهیات گشوده بر مبنای فلسفة صدرایی. جستارهای فلسفة دین، 8(1)، 83 ـ 104.
دیباجی، سید محمدعلی و محمدی‌نیا، عیسی (1399). بررسی مسئلة علم پیشین خداوند در دیدگاه ابوالبرکات بغدادی و الهیات گشوده. فلسفة دین، 18/ 35، 175 ـ 196.
سعیدی‌مهر، محمد (1388). حکمت الهی و مسئلة قرینه‌ای شر. قبسات، 14(52)، 29 ـ 54.
علی‌زاده، بهرام و مقدادی، زکیه (1401). خداباوری و شر گزاف؛ بررسی پاسخ ویلیام هاسکر به مسئلة شر. اندیشة دینی (دانشگاه شیراز)، 22(83)، 73 ـ 94.
Alizadeh, B. & Meghdadi, Z. (2022). Theism and Gratuitous Evil A Critique of Hasker’s Response to The Problem of Evil. Journal of Religious Thought: A Quarterly Journal of Shiraz University, 22(83), 73-94. doi: 10.22099/jrt.2022.42084.2566. (in Persian)
Chrzan, K. (1994). Necessary Gratuitous Evil: An Oxymoron Revisited, Faith and Philosophy, Vol. 11, 134–137.
Copan, P. & Craig W.L. (2004). Creation out of nothing: A biblical, philosophical and scientific exploration, Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic.
Dibaji, S. M. A. & Mohammadinia, E. (2019). Reviewing the Relation of God’s Knowledge and Human’s Freewill in Open Theism Based on Sadra's Philosophy. Jostarha-ye Falsafe-ye Din, 8(1), 83-104. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.22034/rs.2019.4126. (in Persian)
----------------------------------------------. (2020). Surveying Problem of God’s Foreknowledge in Abū al-Barakāt al-Baghdādī’s view and Open Theism. Philosophy of Religion Research, 18(1), 175-196. doi: 10.30497/prr.2020.75449. (in Persian)
Hall, Ch. A. & Sanders, J. (2003). Does God Have a Future? A Debate of Devine Providence, Baker Academic, United States.
Hasker, W. (1992). Providence and evil: Three theories, Religious Studies, 28, 91-105. DOI:10.1017/S0034412500021405.
--------------. (1994). A philosophical perspective. In: C. Pinnock et al. (eds.), The openness of God: A biblical challenge to the traditional understanding of God, (Downers Grove, IL: Intervarsity Press), 126-154.
-------------. (2000). Adequate God. In: J.B. Cobb Jr. & C.H. Pinnock (eds.), Searching for an adequate God: A dialogue between process and free will theists (Grand Rapids, IL: Wm B. Eerdmans), 215-245.
-------------. (2004). Providence, evil, and the openness of God. London: Routledge.
-------------. (2008). The triumph of God over evil: Theodicy for a world of suffering, Westmont, IL: IVP Academic.org/10.1177/0034637314534626
-------------. (2011). An open theist theodicy of natural evil. In: K. Perszyk (ed.), Molinism: The contemporary debate (New York: Oxford University Press), 351-377. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso /9780199590629.003.0018.
Helseth, P.K. (2001). On divine ambivalence: Open theism and the problem of particular evil. Journal of Evangelical Theological Society, 44(3), 493-511.
Highfield, R. (2002). The function of divine self-limitation in open theism: Great wall or picket fence? Journal of Evangelical Theological Society, 45(2), 279-299.
Howard‐Snyder, D. & Howard‐Snyder, F. (1999). Is Theism Compatible with Gratuitous Evil? American Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 36, 115–130.
Mackie J. L. et al. (2005). Philosophical Theology (collection of articles). translated by Ahmad Naraghi and Ebrahim Soltani. Tehran: Serat. (in Persian)
Oord, T.J. (2005). The uncontrolling love of God: An open and relational account of providence. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.
Peterson, M. L. et al. (1991). Reason and Religious Belief: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Religion. New York: Oxford University Press.
Pinnock, C., Rice, R., Sanders, J., Hasker, W., & Basinger, D. (1994). The Openness of God: A Biblical Challenge to the Traditional Understanding of God. Downers Grove: Intervarsity Press.
Pinnock, C. (1996). God’s Sovereignty in Today’s World, Princeton: Theology Today, 53/1.
Plantinga, A. (2005). Philosophy of Religion: God, Free will and Evil. Translation by Mohammad Saeedi-Mehr. Tehran: Taha. (in Persian)
Saeedi-Mehr, M. (2008). Divine wisdom and the Evidential Problem of Evil. Qabsat, 14(52), 29-54. (in Persian)
Sanders, J. (2007a). The God who risks: A theology of divine providence. Downers Grove, IL: Intervarsity Press.
------------- (2007b). An introduction to open theism. Reformed Review: A Theological Journal of Western Theological Seminary, 60(2), 34-50.
Sanders, J. (2010). Open creation and the redemption of the environment, Wesleyan Theological Journal 46(4):141-149.
Vanhoozer, Kevin J. (2012). Remythologizing Theology: Divine Action, Passion, and Authorship, Cambridge University Press.