Most of the theologians and Muslim philosophers, at least In accordance with tradition and narrative, believe in bodily resurrection as a necessary faith; but they have different conceptualizations of the “body of resurrection” such as: elemental body, heavenly body, intermediary body and imaginary body.
The presentation of these conceptualizations will help us to find guidelines for more accurate judgments of bodily resurrection; especially in ascribing the issue of rational repudiation of bodily resurrection to Ibn-Sina, and understanding theologians view about homogenization of body of resurrection with worldly body.
Maftooni, N. & RezaininNia, R. (2012). A comparative study of the quiddity of the body of resurrection according to Ibn-Sina, Suhrawardi and MullaSadra’s view point. Philosophy of Religion, 9(10), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.22059/jpht.2012.24900
MLA
Maftooni, N., & RezaininNia, R. "A comparative study of the quiddity of the body of resurrection according to Ibn-Sina, Suhrawardi and MullaSadra’s view point", Philosophy of Religion, 9, 10, 2012, 93–110. doi: 10.22059/jpht.2012.24900
HARVARD
Maftooni, N., & RezaininNia, R. (2012). 'A comparative study of the quiddity of the body of resurrection according to Ibn-Sina, Suhrawardi and MullaSadra’s view point', Philosophy of Religion, 9(10), pp. 93–110. doi: 10.22059/jpht.2012.24900
CHICAGO
Maftooni, N. & RezaininNia, R., "A comparative study of the quiddity of the body of resurrection according to Ibn-Sina, Suhrawardi and MullaSadra’s view point." Philosophy of Religion, 9 10 (2012): 93–110, doi: 10.22059/jpht.2012.24900
VANCOUVER
Maftooni N., RezaininNia R. A comparative study of the quiddity of the body of resurrection according to Ibn-Sina, Suhrawardi and MullaSadra’s view point. Philosophy of Religion. 2012;9(10):93–110 (In Persian). doi: 10.22059/jpht.2012.24900
